Matchup
Lexus TX vs Lexus RX
The 2026 TX 350 AWD against the 2026 RX 350 AWD, through ten physics labs and every official rating we could find.
Last checked Oct 28, 2026. Every figure links to its source.
The short answer
- The TX stops from 60 mph in 124 ft, 15 ft shorter than the RX (139 ft). TestedMotorTrendTestedMotorTrend
- In the trims shown, the RX costs $5,715 less: $54,375 against $60,090 for the TX, destination included. PublishedLexusPublishedLexus
- The TX has 27.8 cu ft more cargo space behind its second row: 57.4 cu ft against 29.6 cu ft. PublishedLexusPublishedLexus
- The TX is rated to tow 1,500 lb more: 5,000 lb against 3,500 lb. PublishedLexusPublishedCar and Driver
Who each one suits
Same 275-hp turbo four and AWD system, so this comes down to size. The TX adds two seats, 27.8 cu ft behind the second row (57.4 against 29.6), 1,500 lb of towing and far more rear knee room: +6.0 in against +2.1 for a 5-ft-11 passenger. In MotorTrend’s tests it also stopped from 60 mph in 124 ft against 139.
The RX costs $5,715 less in these trims, is rated 24 mpg against 23 and has the lower NHTSA rollover risk (15.5% against 17.4%). Its IIHS record is fuller but mixed: Good small overlap, side and headlights, Poor in the updated moderate overlap test. IIHS has rated the TX only in the small overlap test, where it’s Acceptable.
At a glance
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price, this trim | $60,090PublishedLexus | $54,375PublishedLexus |
| Powertrain | 2.4 L turbocharged four (T24A-FTS) with port and direct injection · Full-time electronically controlled AWD (75:25 to 50:50 front/rear) | 2.4 L turbocharged four (T24A-FTS) with port and direct injection · Full-time electronically controlled AWD (75:25 to 50:50 front/rear) |
| 0–60 mph, tested or claimed | 7.1 sTestedCar and Driver | 7.3 sTestedMotorTrend |
| Braking 70–0 mph, tested | 172 ft (52.4 m)TestedCar and Driver | no data |
| EPA combined | 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km)PublishedEPA | 24 mpg (9.8 L/100 km)PublishedEPA |
| Cargo behind the second row | 57.4 cu ft (1,625 L)PublishedLexus | 29.6 cu ft (838 L)PublishedLexus |
| Large suitcases, packed | 8Simulatedfrom Lexus | 6Simulatedfrom Lexus |
| Seats | 7Published | 5Published |
| Crash ratings | NHTSA 5★ overall · IIHS crash tests A/–/– | NHTSA 5★ overall · IIHS crash tests G/P/G |
Acceleration
No meaningful gap between the TX and the RX on what we can measure here.
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp (205 kW)PublishedLexus | 275 hp (205 kW)PublishedLexus |
| Torque | 317 lb-ft (430 Nm)PublishedLexus | 317 lb-ft (430 Nm)PublishedLexus |
| 0–60 mph, tested or claimed | 7.1 sTestedCar and Driver | 7.3 sTestedMotorTrend |
| 0–60 mph, our simulation | 7.3 sSimulatedfrom Car and Driver | 7.3 sSimulatedfrom MotorTrend |
| Passing, 50–70 mph | 4.6 sTestedCar and Driver | no data |
| Quarter mile | 15.4 sTestedCar and Driver | 15.5 sTestedMotorTrend |
Braking and stopping distance
The TX stops from 60 mph in 124 ft, 15 ft shorter than the RX (139 ft).
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| Braking 70–0 mph, tested | 172 ft (52.4 m)TestedCar and Driver | no data |
| Braking 60–0 mph, tested | 124 ft (37.8 m)TestedMotorTrend | 139 ft (42.4 m)TestedMotorTrend |
| Wet road from 70 mph, 1 s reaction | 357 ft (108.9 m)Simulatedfrom Car and Driver | 381 ft (116.3 m)Simulatedfrom MotorTrend |
| Dry road from 70 mph, 1 s reaction | 275 ft (83.7 m)Simulatedfrom Car and Driver | 291 ft (88.6 m)Simulatedfrom MotorTrend |
| Packed snow from 30 mph, 1 s reaction | 166 ft (50.5 m)Simulatedfrom Car and Driver | 177 ft (54.0 m)Simulatedfrom MotorTrend |
Rollover
NHTSA puts the RX’s single-vehicle rollover risk lower: 15.5% risk against 17.4% risk for the TX.
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA rollover rating | 4★ · 17.4% riskTestedNHTSA | 4★ · 15.5% riskTestedNHTSA |
| Sideways slide that trips it into a roll | 11 mph (18 km/h)Simulated, estimated inputs | 12 mph (19 km/h)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Static stability factor (half-track ÷ CoG height) | 1.20Simulated, estimated inputs | 1.25Simulated, estimated inputs |
Efficiency and running costs
No meaningful gap between the TX and the RX on what we can measure here.
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| EPA combined | 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km)PublishedEPA | 24 mpg (9.8 L/100 km)PublishedEPA |
| Fuel or charging, 15,000 mi a year | $2,920/yrDerivedEPA | $2,799/yrDerivedEPA |
| Steady 75 mph, our simulation | 31 mpg (7.6 L/100 km)Simulatedfrom Car and Driver | 30 mpg (7.8 L/100 km)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Car and Driver |
| Drag coefficient | 0.34PublishedLexus | 0.35PublishedLexus |
Grip, snow and maneuvering
The TX held 0.82 g on the skidpad against 0.75 g for the RX.
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| Skidpad grip, tested | 0.82 gTestedCar and Driver | 0.75 gTestedMotorTrend |
| Cornering grip, our simulation | 0.82 gSimulatedfrom Car and Driver | 0.75 gSimulatedfrom MotorTrend |
| Pulling away on packed snow | 0.27 gSimulatedfrom Car and Driver | 0.24 gSimulatedfrom MotorTrend |
| Turning circle | 38.1 ft (11.6 m)PublishedLexus | 38.7 ft (11.8 m)PublishedLexus |
| Ground clearance | 7.9 in (20 cm)PublishedLexus | 8.1 in (21 cm)PublishedLexus |
| Tires | Goodyear Assurance Finesse 255/55R20 107W · 255/55R20TestedCar and Driver | All-season 235/60R19 · 235/60R19PublishedC/D specs |
Space, luggage and fit
The TX has 27.8 cu ft more cargo space behind its second row: 57.4 cu ft against 29.6 cu ft.
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 7Published | 5Published |
| Large suitcases, packed | 8Simulatedfrom Lexus | 6Simulatedfrom Lexus |
| Carry-ons in the space left | 4Simulatedfrom Lexus | 0Simulatedfrom Lexus |
| Cargo behind the second row | 57.4 cu ft (1,625 L)PublishedLexus | 29.6 cu ft (838 L)PublishedLexus |
| Cargo, seats folded | 97.0 cu ft (2,747 L)PublishedLexus | 46.2 cu ft (1,308 L)PublishedLexus |
| Towing | 5,000 lb (2,268 kg)PublishedLexus | 3,500 lb (1,588 kg)PublishedCar and Driver |
| Driver head room, 6 ft 4 in driver | +0.4 in (1 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs | +1.0 in (3 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Driver head room, 5 ft 11 in driver | +2.9 in (7 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs | +3.4 in (9 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Driver head room, 5 ft 4 in driver | +5.9 in (15 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs | +6.5 in (16 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Rear head room, 5 ft 11 in passenger | +1.6 in (4 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs | +2.9 in (7 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Rear knee room, 5 ft 11 in behind 5 ft 11 in | +6.0 in (15 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs | +2.1 in (5 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Rear head and knee, 6 ft 4 in behind 6 ft 4 in | −1.0 in head · +1.7 in kneeSimulated, estimated inputs | +0.3 in head · −2.2 in kneeSimulated, estimated inputs |
| Front head room, published | 41.4 in (105 cm)PublishedEdmunds | 38.1 in (97 cm)PublishedLexus |
| Rear head room, published | 40.1 in (102 cm)PublishedEdmunds | 38.5 in (98 cm)PublishedLexus |
| Rear leg room, published | 39.5 in (100 cm)PublishedLexus | 37.4 in (95 cm)PublishedLexus |
Cabin noise
No meaningful gap between the TX and the RX on what we can measure here.
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| Cabin sound at 70 mph | 66 dBAEstimateCar and Driver | no data |
Visibility
Drivers see 39% of the ground within 33 ft of the TX’s nose and 32% in the RX.
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| Road hidden in front of the bumper, 5 ft 9 in driver | 29 ft (8.7 m)Simulated | 29 ft (8.7 m)Simulated |
| Ground visible within 33 ft ahead | 39%Simulated | 32%Simulated |
Headlights and night stopping
No meaningful gap between the TX and the RX on what we can measure here.
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| IIHS headlight rating | no data | GoodTestedIIHS |
| Low beams, straight road (right edge) | no data | 335 ft (102.2 m)TestedIIHS |
| Fastest you can stop inside the low beams | no data | 69 mph (111 km/h)Simulatedfrom IIHS |
| High beams, straight road (right edge) | no data | 453 ft (138.1 m)TestedIIHS |
Crash safety
In the IIHS small overlap front test the RX rates Good and the TX Acceptable.
| TX | RX | |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall | 5★TestedNHTSA | 5★TestedNHTSA |
| IIHS small overlap front | AcceptableTestedIIHS | GoodTestedIIHS |
| IIHS moderate overlap front (updated) | no data | PoorTestedIIHS |
| IIHS side (updated) | no data | GoodTestedIIHS |
| Curb weight | 4,427 lb (2,008 kg)TestedCar and Driver | 4,394 lb (1,993 kg)TestedMotorTrend |
Where each one wins
Lexus TX
- The TX stops from 60 mph in 124 ft, 15 ft shorter than the RX (139 ft). TestedMotorTrendTestedMotorTrend
- The TX has 27.8 cu ft more cargo space behind its second row: 57.4 cu ft against 29.6 cu ft. PublishedLexusPublishedLexus
- The TX is rated to tow 1,500 lb more: 5,000 lb against 3,500 lb. PublishedLexusPublishedCar and Driver
- The TX seats 7; the RX seats 5. Published
- Our packing test fits 8 large suitcases in the TX and 6 in the RX. Simulatedfrom LexusSimulatedfrom Lexus
- Behind a 5-ft-11 driver, a 5-ft-11 passenger gets +6.0 in of knee room in the TX and +2.1 in in the RX. Simulated, estimated inputs
- The TX held 0.82 g on the skidpad against 0.75 g for the RX. TestedCar and DriverTestedMotorTrend
- On packed snow the TX can pull away at 0.27 g, against 0.24 g for the RX. Simulatedfrom Car and DriverSimulatedfrom MotorTrend
- Drivers see 39% of the ground within 33 ft of the TX’s nose and 32% in the RX. Simulated
Lexus RX
- In the trims shown, the RX costs $5,715 less: $54,375 against $60,090 for the TX, destination included. PublishedLexusPublishedLexus
- NHTSA puts the RX’s single-vehicle rollover risk lower: 15.5% risk against 17.4% risk for the TX. TestedNHTSATestedNHTSA
- In the IIHS small overlap front test the RX rates Good and the TX Acceptable. TestedIIHSTestedIIHS
- A 5-ft-11 rear passenger has +2.9 in of head room in the RX and +1.6 in in the TX. Simulated, estimated inputs
- It takes a 12 mph sideways slide into a curb to roll the RX; the TX goes over at 11 mph. Simulated, estimated inputs
Other trims
- TX 350 AWD · on this page
- TX 500h F Sport Performance
- RX 350 AWD · on this page
- RX 350h F Sport Design
Keep comparing
Sources
- MotorTrend: 2024 Lexus TX350 AWD First Test: Cruiser, Not a Bruiser (TX 350 Luxury AWD) (2024-10)
- MotorTrend: 2023 Lexus RX SUV of the Year review (test data: RX 350 FWD, RX 350h, RX 500h) (2023-10)
- Lexus USA Newsroom: Style, Utility, and Comfort: The 2026 Lexus TX (outputs, cargo, MSRP + DPH price list updated June 19, 2026) (2026-06)
- Lexus: 2026 RX grades, starting MSRP, 0–60 estimates, top speed and fuel capacity; $1,550 RX delivery, processing and handling fee (Lexus pricing disclaimer) (2026-10)
- Lexus Canada: 2026 RX Product Information (dimensions, overhangs, Cd, gear ratios, weights, motors, battery, interior) (2026-10)
- Lexus Canada: 2026 TX Product Information (dimensions, overhangs, Cd, gear ratios, weights, motors, battery, brakes, interior) (2025-12)
- Car and Driver: 2026 Lexus RX review, pricing and specs (RX 350 not yet instrument-tested; towing) (2026-10)
- Car and Driver: Tested: 2024 Lexus TX Elbows Its Way into the Three-Row SUV Scene (TX350 FWD test results) (2023-12)
- MotorTrend: 2023 Lexus RX350 F Sport First Test (RX 350 AWD F Sport Handling) (2023-01)
- US EPA (fueleconomy.gov): 2026 Lexus TX 350 AWD (id 49924) and TX 500h AWD (id 49923) ratings (2026-10)
- US EPA (fueleconomy.gov): 2026 Lexus RX 350 AWD (id 49858) and RX 350h AWD (id 49857) ratings (2026-10)
- NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings: 2026 Lexus TX 350 SUV AWD (VehicleId 21637) (2026-10)
- NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings: 2026 Lexus RX 350 SUV AWD (VehicleId 21620) (2026-10)
- Car and Driver: Tested: The Larger 2024 Toyota Grand Highlander Hits the Mark (XLE AWD and Hybrid Max Platinum) (2023-08)
- Car and Driver (Chrome Data): 2026 Lexus RX 350 features and specs (gear ratios, 3.33 axle, 19-in wheels and P235/60VR19 tires) (2026-10)
- Edmunds: 2026 Lexus TX 350 FWD specs (headroom without the panoramic roof) (2026-10)
- IIHS: 2026 Lexus RX ratings (crash tests apply to 2023–26 models) (2026-10)
- IIHS: 2026 Lexus TX ratings (small overlap only, from Grand Highlander tests) (2026-10)
Badges: Published figures come from the maker, a regulator or a rating agency; Tested from an independent instrumented test; Simulated are computed by our physics from those inputs (how); Estimate means no published value exists. Confirm figures with the maker or your dealer before you buy.