Matchup
Toyota Tacoma vs Ford F-150
The 2026 Tacoma TRD Off-Road Double Cab 4x4 against the 2026 F-150 XLT SuperCrew 4x4 3.5 EcoBoost, through ten physics labs and every official rating we could find.
Last checked Oct 24, 2026. Every figure links to its source.
The short answer
- In the trims shown, the Tacoma costs $11,270 less: $45,660 against $56,930 for the F-150, destination included. PublishedEdmundsPublishedJ.D. Power
- The F-150’s bed is 6.8 in longer at the floor: 67.1 in against 60.3 in. PublishedToyotaPublishedFord
- The F-150 is rated to tow 4,200 lb more: 10,500 lb against 6,300 lb. PublishedEdmundsPublishedFord
- At 15,000 miles a year and national average prices, the Tacoma costs about $336 a year less to run: $3,199/yr against $3,535/yr. DerivedEPADerivedEPA
Who each one suits
The F-150 is the work truck: 4,200 lb more towing, 295 lb more payload, a bed 6.8 in longer, six seats and far more rear knee room. It has the better NHTSA rating and headlights.
The Tacoma costs $11,270 less in these trims, about $336 a year less to run, rides higher, turns tighter and pulls away harder on packed snow in our simulation.
At a glance
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price, this trim | $45,660PublishedEdmunds | $56,930PublishedJ.D. Power |
| Powertrain | 2.4 L turbocharged four (i-FORCE, T24A-FTS) with port and direct injection · Part-time 4x4 (shift-on-the-fly, 2.57 low range), electronic locking rear differential | 3.5 L twin-turbocharged EcoBoost V6 with port and direct injection and a gasoline particulate filter · Part-time 4x4 (electronic shift-on-the-fly) |
| 0–60 mph, tested or claimed | 7.0 sTestedCar and Driver | no data |
| Braking 70–0 mph, tested | 171 ft (52.1 m)TestedCar and Driver | no data |
| EPA combined | 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km)PublishedEPA | 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km)PublishedEPA |
| Bed length at the floor | 60.3 in (1.53 m)PublishedToyota | 67.1 in (1.70 m)PublishedFord |
| Seats | 5PublishedToyota | 6Published |
| Crash ratings | NHTSA 4★ overall · IIHS crash tests G/M/G | NHTSA 5★ overall · IIHS crash tests G/P/G |
Acceleration
The F-150 makes 104 hp more: 382 hp against 278 hp.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 278 hp (207 kW)PublishedToyota | 382 hp (285 kW)PublishedFord |
| Torque | 317 lb-ft (430 Nm)PublishedToyota | 500 lb-ft (678 Nm)PublishedFord |
| 0–60 mph, tested or claimed | 7.0 sTestedCar and Driver | no data |
| 0–60 mph, our simulation | 6.6 sSimulatedfrom Car and Driver | 5.0 sSimulated, estimated inputsfrom Ford |
| Passing, 50–70 mph | 4.8 sTestedCar and Driver | no data |
| Quarter mile | 15.3 sTestedCar and Driver | no data |
Braking and stopping distance
On a wet road from 70 mph, reaction included, the Tacoma needs 354 ft to stop and the F-150 377 ft: 23 ft more road for the F-150.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| Braking 70–0 mph, tested | 171 ft (52.1 m)TestedCar and Driver | no data |
| Wet road from 70 mph, 1 s reaction | 354 ft (107.9 m)Simulatedfrom Car and Driver | 377 ft (114.9 m)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Car and Driver |
| Dry road from 70 mph, 1 s reaction | 274 ft (83.4 m)Simulatedfrom Car and Driver | 288 ft (87.7 m)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Car and Driver |
| Packed snow from 30 mph, 1 s reaction | 139 ft (42.4 m)Simulatedfrom Car and Driver | 175 ft (53.3 m)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Car and Driver |
Rollover
No meaningful gap between the Tacoma and the F-150 on what we can measure here.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA rollover rating | 4★ · 18.5% riskTestedNHTSA | 4★ · 19.1% riskTestedNHTSA |
| Sideways slide that trips it into a roll | 11 mph (18 km/h)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom NHTSA | 11 mph (18 km/h)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom NHTSA |
| Static stability factor (half-track ÷ CoG height) | 1.17Simulated, estimated inputsfrom NHTSA | 1.16Simulated, estimated inputsfrom NHTSA |
Efficiency and running costs
At 15,000 miles a year and national average prices, the Tacoma costs about $336 a year less to run: $3,199/yr against $3,535/yr.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| EPA combined | 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km)PublishedEPA | 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km)PublishedEPA |
| Fuel or charging, 15,000 mi a year | $3,199/yrDerivedEPA | $3,535/yrDerivedEPA |
| Steady 75 mph, our simulation | 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km)Simulatedfrom Car and Driver | 23 mpg (10.3 L/100 km)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Car and Driver |
| Drag coefficient | 0.47DerivedEPA | 0.40DerivedEPA |
Grip, snow and maneuvering
On packed snow the Tacoma can pull away at 0.34 g, against 0.24 g for the F-150.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| Skidpad grip, tested | 0.77 gTestedCar and Driver | no data |
| Cornering grip, our simulation | 0.77 gSimulatedfrom Car and Driver | 0.76 gSimulated, estimated inputsfrom Car and Driver |
| Pulling away on packed snow | 0.34 gSimulatedfrom Car and Driver | 0.24 gSimulated, estimated inputsfrom Car and Driver |
| Turning circle | 44.4 ft (13.5 m)PublishedToyota | 47.8 ft (14.6 m)PublishedThe Car Connection |
| Ground clearance | 11.0 in (28 cm)PublishedEdmunds | 9.8 in (25 cm)PublishedFord |
| Tires | BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A 265/70R17 115S M+S · 265/70R17TestedCar and Driver | 275/65R18 (Michelin Primacy XC on the XLT 4x4) · 275/65R18EstimateCar and Driver |
Space, luggage and fit
The F-150’s bed is 6.8 in longer at the floor: 67.1 in against 60.3 in.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5PublishedToyota | 6Published |
| Bed length at the floor | 60.3 in (1.53 m)PublishedToyota | 67.1 in (1.70 m)PublishedFord |
| Payload | 1,610 lb (730 kg)PublishedEdmunds | 1,905 lb (864 kg)PublishedFord |
| Towing | 6,300 lb (2,858 kg)PublishedEdmunds | 10,500 lb (4,763 kg)PublishedFord |
| Driver head room, 6 ft 4 in driver | −0.2 in (0 cm)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Toyota | +0.3 in (1 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Driver head room, 5 ft 11 in driver | +2.4 in (6 cm)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Toyota | +2.9 in (7 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Driver head room, 5 ft 4 in driver | +5.7 in (15 cm)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Toyota | +6.3 in (16 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Rear head room, 5 ft 11 in passenger | +2.1 in (5 cm)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Toyota | +2.0 in (5 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Rear knee room, 5 ft 11 in behind 5 ft 11 in | +1.7 in (4 cm)Simulated, estimated inputsfrom Toyota | +6.4 in (16 cm)Simulated, estimated inputs |
| Rear head and knee, 6 ft 4 in behind 6 ft 4 in | −0.5 in head · −2.6 in kneeSimulated, estimated inputsfrom Toyota | −0.5 in head · +2.1 in kneeSimulated, estimated inputs |
| Front head room, published | 39.7 in (101 cm)PublishedToyota | 40.8 in (104 cm)PublishedFord |
| Rear head room, published | 38.4 in (98 cm)PublishedToyota | 40.4 in (103 cm)PublishedFord |
| Rear leg room, published | 33.7 in (86 cm)PublishedToyota | 43.6 in (111 cm)PublishedFord |
Cabin noise
No meaningful gap between the Tacoma and the F-150 on what we can measure here.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cabin sound at 70 mph | 67 dBATestedCar and Driver | no data |
Visibility
From the driver’s seat the F-150’s hood hides the first 32 ft of road; the Tacoma’s hides 39 ft.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| Road hidden in front of the bumper, 5 ft 9 in driver | 39 ft (12.0 m)Simulated | 32 ft (9.7 m)Simulated |
| Ground visible within 33 ft ahead | 56%Simulated | 43%Simulated |
Headlights and night stopping
IIHS rates the F-150’s headlights Good and the Tacoma’s Acceptable.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| IIHS headlight rating | AcceptableTestedIIHS | GoodTestedIIHS |
| Low beams, straight road (right edge) | 312 ft (95.2 m)TestedIIHS | 341 ft (103.8 m)TestedIIHS |
| Fastest you can stop inside the low beams | 68 mph (110 km/h)Simulatedfrom IIHS | 70 mph (113 km/h)Simulatedfrom IIHS |
| High beams, straight road (right edge) | 457 ft (139.3 m)TestedIIHS | 560 ft (170.8 m)TestedIIHS |
Crash safety
NHTSA gives the F-150 5★ overall and the Tacoma 4★.
| Tacoma | F-150 | |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA overall | 4★TestedNHTSA | 5★TestedNHTSA |
| IIHS small overlap front | GoodTestedIIHS | GoodTestedIIHS |
| IIHS moderate overlap front (updated) | MarginalTestedIIHS | PoorTestedIIHS |
| IIHS side (updated) | GoodTestedIIHS | GoodTestedIIHS |
| Curb weight | 4,794 lb (2,175 kg)TestedCar and Driver | 5,096 lb (2,312 kg)PublishedFord |
Where each one wins
Toyota Tacoma
- In the trims shown, the Tacoma costs $11,270 less: $45,660 against $56,930 for the F-150, destination included. PublishedEdmundsPublishedJ.D. Power
- At 15,000 miles a year and national average prices, the Tacoma costs about $336 a year less to run: $3,199/yr against $3,535/yr. DerivedEPADerivedEPA
- On a wet road from 70 mph, reaction included, the Tacoma needs 354 ft to stop and the F-150 377 ft: 23 ft more road for the F-150. Simulatedfrom Car and DriverSimulated, estimated inputsfrom Car and Driver
- On packed snow the Tacoma can pull away at 0.34 g, against 0.24 g for the F-150. Simulatedfrom Car and DriverSimulated, estimated inputsfrom Car and Driver
- The Tacoma turns in a 3.4 ft tighter circle: 44.4 ft against 47.8 ft. PublishedToyotaPublishedThe Car Connection
- The Tacoma is rated 21 mpg combined by the EPA, 2 mpg better than the F-150 (19 mpg). PublishedEPAPublishedEPA
- In the IIHS moderate overlap front test the Tacoma rates Marginal and the F-150 Poor. TestedIIHSTestedIIHS
- Drivers see 56% of the ground within 33 ft of the Tacoma’s nose and 43% in the F-150. Simulated
- The Tacoma rides higher: 11.0 in of ground clearance against 9.8 in. PublishedEdmundsPublishedFord
Ford F-150
- The F-150’s bed is 6.8 in longer at the floor: 67.1 in against 60.3 in. PublishedToyotaPublishedFord
- The F-150 is rated to tow 4,200 lb more: 10,500 lb against 6,300 lb. PublishedEdmundsPublishedFord
- Behind a 5-ft-11 driver, a 5-ft-11 passenger gets +6.4 in of knee room in the F-150 and +1.7 in in the Tacoma. Simulated, estimated inputsfrom ToyotaSimulated, estimated inputs
- From the driver’s seat the F-150’s hood hides the first 32 ft of road; the Tacoma’s hides 39 ft. Simulated
- The F-150 makes 104 hp more: 382 hp against 278 hp. PublishedToyotaPublishedFord
- The F-150 carries 295 lb more payload: 1,905 lb against 1,610 lb. PublishedEdmundsPublishedFord
- In our simulation the F-150 gets to 60 mph 1.6 s sooner: 5.0 s against 6.6 s. Simulatedfrom Car and DriverSimulated, estimated inputsfrom Ford
- The F-150 seats 6; the Tacoma seats 5. PublishedToyotaPublished
- NHTSA gives the F-150 5★ overall and the Tacoma 4★. TestedNHTSATestedNHTSA
- IIHS rates the F-150’s headlights Good and the Tacoma’s Acceptable. TestedIIHSTestedIIHS
- On low beams, the fastest you can drive the F-150 and still stop inside the lit road is 70 mph; in the Tacoma it’s 68 mph (dry road, 1.5-second reaction). Simulatedfrom IIHSSimulatedfrom IIHS
- IIHS measured the F-150’s low beams lighting the road 29 ft farther on a straightaway: 341 ft against 312 ft. TestedIIHSTestedIIHS
Other trims
Keep comparing
Sources
- Edmunds: 2026 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off-Road Double Cab 5’ Bed AT 4WD features and specs (2026-10)
- J.D. Power: 2026 Ford F-150 XLT 4WD SuperCrew 5.5’ Box pricing (MSRP $51,915) (2026-10)
- Toyota: 2026 Tacoma product information and specifications (engines, ratios, dimensions, bed, interior, brakes, turning radius; forum-hosted copy) (2025)
- Ford: 2026 F-150 specifications (dimensions, box, weights, payload, towing, engines, interior) (2026-10)
- Ford: 2026 Ford RV & Trailer Towing Guide (F-150 conventional towing tables; dealer-hosted copy) (2026)
- US EPA (fueleconomy.gov): 2026 Toyota Tacoma SR5/Sport/Off-Road/Limited 4WD (id 50088) and Tacoma Hybrid 4WD (id 50109) ratings (2026-10)
- US EPA (fueleconomy.gov): 2026 Ford F150 Pickup 4WD 3.5 L (id 50099) and F150 Pickup 4WD HEV (id 50097) ratings (2026-10)
- Car and Driver: Tested: 2024 Toyota Tacoma Is No Longer a Dinosaur (TRD Off-Road Double Cab, 8-speed automatic) (2023-12)
- Car and Driver: Tested: 2025 Ford F-150 XLT Hybrid (XLT SuperCrew 4x4 PowerBoost) (2025-04)
- NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings: 2026 Toyota Tacoma PU/CC (Double Cab) 4WD (VehicleId 21675) (2026-10)
- NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings: 2026 Ford F-150 (SuperCrew) gas 4WD (VehicleId 21411) (2026-10)
- Car and Driver: 2021 Ford F-150 Tremor tested (3.5 L EcoBoost, SuperCrew 4x4 5.5-ft) (2021-12)
- US EPA: Data on cars used for testing fuel economy, MY2026 (Tacoma 4WD and Tacoma Hybrid 4WD coastdown targets, axle ratios) (2026-01)
- US EPA: Data on cars used for testing fuel economy, MY2026 (F-150 3.5 L 4WD, Tremor and HEV coastdown targets, axle ratios) (2026-01)
- The Car Connection: 2025 Ford F-150 specifications (turning diameter, brake rotor diameters) (2026-10)
- IIHS: 2026 Toyota Tacoma crew cab pickup ratings (2026-10)
- IIHS: 2026 Ford F-150 crew cab pickup ratings (2026-10)
Badges: Published figures come from the maker, a regulator or a rating agency; Tested from an independent instrumented test; Simulated are computed by our physics from those inputs (how); Estimate means no published value exists. Confirm figures with the maker or your dealer before you buy.